Leverage AIM for Improved Pipeline Integrity Management

Leverage AIM for Improved Pipeline Integrity Management

When it comes to asset integrity management (AIM), few sectors are as comprehensive and in need as the pipeline industry. With potentially hundreds of miles of pipeline segments, a multitude of different assets across initial gathering and process facilities, and the exorbitant amount of data captured from the initial pipeline construction through the asset’s lifecycle, it is no wonder that an entire market of products exists with the sole purpose of managing pipeline integrity. In fact, many owner operators of pipelines today utilize such programs, called Pipeline Integrity Management Systems (PIMS), for their mechanical integrity needs.

Asset Performance Management vs Asset Integrity Management: What’s the Difference? (Part 1)

Asset Performance Management vs Asset Integrity Management: What’s the Difference?

Two “buzz terms” have been floating around in the world of asset management recently: Asset Performance Management (APM) and Asset Integrity Management (AIM). Semantically, they appear to be very similar. Indeed, that has led to a lot of confusion throughout the industry. Professionals from asset-intensive organizations are often asking: What are these terms? Do they mean the same thing? If not, what’s the difference? Why should I care?

Harness Asset Integrity Management to Maximize LNG Liquefaction Expansion

Harness Asset Integrity Management to Maximize LNG Liquefaction Expansion

The LNG industry is expanding rapidly, growing 4-6% annually. In fact, LNG now accounts for 12% of all gas demand. This is in large part due to new technologies that have surfaced in the industry in recent years – namely offshore facilities like Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRUs) and Floating Liquefaction – that are increasing the market’s reach and encouraging global liquefaction development.

Best Practices for Implementing a Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Program

Best Practices for Implementing a Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Program

The immediate cost saving advantages of adopting a Risk Based Inspection (RBI) approach to asset integrity management are gaining momentum. More and more corporations are realizing that RBI, with its ability to intelligently analyze equipment’s probability of failure (POF) vs consequence of failure (COF), is the more prudent approach to managing their critical assets. It assures that a structured, systematic, and technically defensible approach is used to make decisions. After all, it drastically reduces instances of equipment failure and more than halves the likelihood of unplanned shutdowns.

Improving Mining Operations with Asset Integrity Management Software

Improving Mining Operations with Asset Integrity Management Software

When it comes to centralized asset integrity management (AIM), few industries have as critical a need for it than the Mining industry. In particular, many Oil Sands Mining companies have benefited dramatically from implementing these innovative and pro-active mechanical integrity solutions to manage and protect their critical assets.

This site uses cookies and visitor analytics scripts to implement traffic and performance measurements. You can view our Privacy Policy to find out how we collect and manage this data. If you continue using the site and do not change your settings, you’ll be affirming that you are fine with all cookies and data collection on the Metegrity website. Please remember, that you can change your browser’s cookie settings at any time and opt out of analytics. You can find out more by reviewing our Cookie Policy page.